Mid-market companies hit this point a few years into NetSuite. The functional side is covered. What's missing is a developer to build and own the technical layer. That layer is the only thing I do.
Most of my work is building new things: workflows, integrations, custom logic. The rest is modernising and fixing what's already there. Either way, it's SuiteScript 2.1 written by the person you spoke to first.
New automation, built from scratch
Approval workflows, order automation, scheduled batch processing, RESTlet APIs, custom Suitelets. Built in SuiteScript 2.1 with governance limits designed in, tested against real data in sandbox, and documented for your team.
NetSuite needs to talk to other systems
Connecting NetSuite to ecommerce platforms, 3PLs, payment providers, and internal tools. RESTlets, SuiteTalk, or middleware, whichever fits the job. Error handling and alerting are part of the design, so you hear about failures before your customers do.
Requirements beyond standard configuration
New subsidiaries, new transaction types, complex pricing logic. I design the technical approach first, validate it against NetSuite's governance model, then build it so it still holds up when the next requirement arrives.
Scripts no one can safely touch
SuiteScript 1.0 still in production, logic spread across files nobody documented, releases that break things no one can trace. I audit what's there, write the business logic down, and migrate it to 2.1 so your team can make changes again.
Integrations that fail quietly
Data that stops syncing, duplicate records, errors that surface three weeks later in a report. I find the root cause, rebuild with proper error handling, alerting, and idempotency, and document what was built.
Every engagement runs the same four steps, from first call to a handover your team can maintain without me.
You describe what you need: new automation, an integration, or an existing problem. I ask questions, assess the complexity, and tell you whether it's work I can do well. If it isn't, I'll say so on the call.
Defined deliverables, a fixed or capped price, and an honest account of the risks. You know exactly what you're buying before any work starts.
Governance-aware SuiteScript 2.1, written by the person you spoke to on the first call and tested against real data in sandbox. Error handling and alerting are designed in from the start.
Every engagement ends with documentation your team can actually use: what was built, why, and how to change it safely. You shouldn't need me to understand your own system.
Most of the work is new development: approval workflows, order automation, scheduled batch processing, RESTlet APIs, custom Suitelets, and integrations between NetSuite and third-party systems such as ecommerce platforms, 3PLs, and payment providers. Ryzoa also audits and modernises existing SuiteScript, including 1.0 to 2.1 migration, and rebuilds integrations that have become unreliable.
Companies running NetSuite without a SuiteScript developer in-house. Usually that means a mid-market business that needs automation, integrations, or custom workflows built properly, or one where customisations have grown over the years and need an owner. If your project is functional implementation or configuration with no development component, Ryzoa is not the right fit.
Yes. Alongside new development, Ryzoa takes on SuiteScript audits, 1.0 to 2.1 migration, and integration rescue work: failing syncs, duplicate records, and errors that surface long after the fact. The same standards apply either way, with error handling, sandbox testing, and documentation your team can use.
Ryzoa is a solo specialist practice. The person you speak to on the first call is the person who scopes the work, writes the code, and does the handover. Nothing is subcontracted or passed to a junior.
Ryzoa does not provide functional implementation support (requirements workshops, module selection, business process design), configuration-only work with no SuiteScript or integration component, general NetSuite administration, or full-time embedded resource.
With a 30-minute technical review call. You describe what you need, whether that's new automation, an integration, or an existing problem, and Ryzoa assesses the complexity and fit. If it's a good fit, a scoped proposal follows within a few days, with defined deliverables and a fixed or capped price.
A 30-minute call about what you want to build or fix. You get a straight answer on whether I can help, and a scoped proposal within days if I can.
If I can't help, I'll tell you on the call.
